Skip to main content

Peer Assessment sheet Q1b

Peer Assessment Question 1b Portfolio

Question/Theory:
Narrative essay
Student name: Levi Bent

MEG: C               Working at Grade: C
List theorists & theories referenced:

1 Todorov- Equilibrium, disequilibrium and resolution
2 Levi strauss- Good vs evil, Man vs Woman and Protagonist vs Antagonist.

3Binary Opposites

4 Barthes- Enigma code

5Propp- Damsel- in- distress

List terminology words:

Binary Opposites, enigma code, stereotypical, teen punishment, mis-en-scene, disequilibrium, equilibrium, resolution, linear structure, montage, disruption, protagonist, antagonist,

Level
Description
Ref no
Grade
Agree?
Level 1:
Outlines or describes 1 theorist with little reference to own production, and is under 250 words (1 side handwritten A4)

U

Level 2 lower:
Introduces and describes 2-3 relevant theories using some correct terminology/theorists

E

Level 2 mid:
Provides some examples but inconsistently and/or lacks correct explanation of how it applies

E/D-

Level 2 higher:
Provides a maximum of 2 theories and introduces correctly in some depth and with some reference to own production

D

Level 3 lower:
The essay uses paragraphs and full sentences, there are minimal errors in grammar or spelling

C-

Level 3 lower:
Gives specific textual examples from own production of how 3-4 theories can be applied

C



I agree
Level 3 mid:
Explains why or how it is relevant or significant to own production rather than explaining the theory

C/B-


Level 3 higher:
Discusses how the theory is or is not applicable and gives reasons to justify, possibly referring to existing media or creative intentions

B

Level 3 higher:
Consistently analyses how the theoretical approach creates significance or meaning

B+


Level 4:
Evaluates the extent that 4 or more theories are applicable, with justification in relation to creative intentions

A
Level 4:
Confidently justifies argument with detailed textual examples from the production and conventions of existing media it is based on

A
Level 4:
There are no or minimal grammatical or spelling errors and terminology is used confidently, regularly and correctly

A

What are the 3 priority targets to secure the grade or move to a higher level

1. Application of theory and analysis

Justify how the theories can be applied into my own work.
2. Use of examples


More theorists to be added on to my work
3. Use of terminology


Apply more terminology to sustain a high grade


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Individual analysis of 3 existing Horror Trailers in booklet (Lesson 1.1)

Individual analysis of 3 existing Horror Trailers in booklet I will be analyzing three different monster sub genres focusing on: Mis en scene, Camera, Editing and Sound.  Sub genre Monsters: Godzilla 1954 trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKrj1ymJzmo The sub genre of monsters is a classic trait as a horror film as it is easy to identify and audience are very attracted to it. Specifically speaking of the Godzilla trailer made in 1954 by Japanese creator Ishiro Honda. Firstly I noticed how sound played a pivotal role in emphasizing the effect of a 60ft monster, the pace of the sound was also admirable as the frantic, fluctuated music pace matched with the trailer enticing the audience into wanting why that was. In addition editing techniques such as jump cuts were evident in the trailer as they helped build tension to the trailer quickly building anticipation for the audience. Furthermore cross cutting was integrated into the trailer as the audience sa...

Levi Bent's Horror Trailer

Levi Ben t's Horror Trailer